INDIAN INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH INTO TRUE HISTORY

 

Newsletter No 26 of 16 October 1994

 

1 News and current affairs

 

1.1 Change of telephone number

Mr Godbole can now be contacted during office hours on 0171-308-2683. His office has shifted to 30 The South Colonnade, London E14, 5EU. The nearest station is Canary Wharf of the Dockland Light Railway ( DLR )

 

1.2 Taj Mahal

1.2.1Taj Mahal and the Great British Conspiracy

Mr Godbole has completed the proof reading and sent the necessary papers to Dr Bedekar. This work is expected to be published in three months' time.

 

1.2.2 Taj Mahal Slide Show

First show took place at Mr Manohar Oak's home at Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire on 24 July. Mr Oak had a Satyanarayan Puja. Afterwards the slide show took place. 25 adults and 10 youngsters attended.

 

Second show took place on 1st September at Ashfield House, West Kensington, London W14. Twenty Engineers from London Underground attended. It was well received.

 

1.2.3 Hindu symbols in Taj mahal

There is a ring of three-in-one Ganesh all around the main gateway, about 3 ft from the floor. This was discovered by Ashok Athavale of Kanpur in 1981. Gopal Godse’s  article on the subject appeared in the Marathi daily Samna of Bombay on 11 August 1994. 

 

1.3 Why rewrite Indian History?

This article by Mr Godbole was published in December 1982 issue of Itihas Patrika of Thane. Dr Bedekar has now published it as a booklet. Copies are available from Mr Godbole..

 

1.4 The Falsity of Indo-Saracenic Architecture

Mr Godbole has started typing this work which has been postponed for one reason or the other, for last 13 years. A start was made last year, when at the request of Dr Bedekar, Godbole gave a lecture on the subject at Thane, India.

 

1.5 Around London tour

1.5.1First tour of places associated with Indian freedom fighters in London was on 17 June. It was specifically arranged by Mr Godbole for Mrs Anjali Kelkar, Publicity Manager, Maharashtra Tourist Development Corporation. She was impressed and is trying to promote the idea to tourist companies in India who organise tours in Europe.

 

1.5.2 Second tour was on 3 July. The participants were : Dharam Sandhu, a social worker from Brent Borough Council, he originally came from Mauritius, Bavasingh, an electronics Engineer, Deva Narayan Arya, a pensioner from Holland who originally comes from Surinam, and Mr Raghavan, a retired Architect from London Borough of Haringey. Once again Mr Godbole's narration was recorded on tape.

Mr Bavasingh is going to buy a video camera It is hoped that a video of the tour will soon be made available to public.

 

1.5.3 Visitors from America have to wait for 9 to 10 hours at Heathrow Airport when they are on the way to India. They can easily visit some of the places associated with our freedom fighters in London. Mr Godbole is exploring the possibility of such tours with his friends in America. If you can help please contact him.

 

1.6 Veer Savarkar

Mr Godbole is writing a book entitled Savarkar's rationalism ( Savarkarancha Buddhivad ) 110 pages have been written so far. It is hoped that one of Godbole's relatives would translate it into English.

 

1.7 Amity between Sikhs and Non Sikh Hindus

The RSS had a Shibir for one week at Leeds in July. On the last day (30 July) meals for the 500 attendees were provided by the local Gurudwara. Providing free meals

(langar) is a tradition of Gurudwaras. In the olden days many students in England and America had taken advantage of this facility, as they did not have enough money.

 

1.8 Visitors

Mr Jawadekar, an expert in the field of Human Resources Development, from Pune met Mr Godbole in September. He was particularly pleased with Mr Godbole’s work on Rationalism of Veer Savarkar.

 

1.9 Hindu Awakening at last?

1.9.1 On 14 July 1994 Jeff Postlewaite reported for the Evening Standard, “ New plea in the battle to save Krishna temple.”

Thousands of Hare Krishna disciples are planning a direct appeal to Environment Secretary John Gummer today after their fight over the right to worship erupted in fresh bitterness. The legal move followed angry scenes outside Hertsmere council offices in Borehamwood as councillors met over the future of the controversial temple at Bhaktivedanta Manor in Hertfordshire.

Three people were arrested as more than 4,000 demonstrators clashed with security guards - two youths for public order offences and a 25-year-old man charged with carrying an offensive weapon.

The planning meeting ended in deadlock with no decision on the Hare Krishna’s bid to build a £1million road diverting worshippers away from the village of Letchmore Heath. Residents have waged a long-running campaign against the manor, donated by George Harrison. A special council meeting may now be called before the next scheduled session in October to decide the issue which has inflamed passions, with Hindus claiming objectors are bent on “ ethnic cleansing "

But the temple’s devotees are ready to by-pass the local authority by pleading directly to Government ministers, already aware that a defeat for the International Society for Krishna Consciousness could harm Britain’s relations with India. The Indian Prime Minister has already warned Mr Gummer and Michael Heseltine of a trade boycott unless the manor is allowed to continue. [could this be true ? if so it must be a good sign]

The planning meeting was told that the new road should not be allowed to cut through green belt and that the temple should be moved to a new site to prevent increased noise.

[ So, it is o.k. for extensive roads to be built to satisfy government’s craze for more and more roads, but not for diverting traffic away from the village of Letchmore Heath.]

 

1.9.2 We are happy to note that Sangh Sandesh the quarterly bulletin of the RSS is now dealing with far more practical issues than before. We give some examples :-

 

Sept-Oct 1991 issue deals with the distribution of copies of Bible to school students in Toronto, Canada . Hindus had a right to object this practice, but no one did. In 1988 one Mr Narendra Shah objected. Now Hindu students are given Hindu Holy books.

 

In July-August 1993 issue we find :-

* condemnation of Winston Churchill’s speech on immigrants by VHP

* information on a Hindu orphanage in Bombay called Vatsalya

* monitoring of anti-Hindu stance of the BBC and ITV in their coverage of news of Indians in U.K or news from India.

 

In Sept-Oct 1993 issue we find :-

* information about Sewa International, a Hindu charity formed to deal with crisis such as the earthquake disaster in Maharashtra in September 1993.

* report of visit to Israel by Mr Thengadi, and address of Hindu-Israel friendship society of America.

* Raising of objections by Mrs Pattani and Mrs Dave to Anti-Hindu speeches at a seminar in   London on 15 August 1993. It was entitled Gandhi’s India or Godse’s India

.

In Jan-Feb 1994 issue we find :-

* plight of Hindus in Afghanistan.

* availability of Gita in British courts for swearing. (when Mr Godbole was called to jury service in Feb 1989 there was only the Old Testament for the Jews, Bible for the

Christians and Koran for the Muslims. He therefore did not swear. He affirmed.)

* details of actual work of Sewa International in the earthquake affected areas of

  Maharashtra.

 

In May-June 1994 issue we find :-

* letter from Raman Banerjee, giving details of subsidies given to Haj pilgrims by Government of India, while taxing Hindu pilgrims in India.

* report by D P Sharma and P Kothari on Narasinha Rao’s lecture at Guildhall, London. They complained that Mr Rao was a miserable failure.

 

1.10 I stand by my man

Over the past 10 years sex scandals of prominent British and American politicians have come to light. But what do their wives do? They stand by their men! Of course when the same attitude was displayed by Hindu women, it is taken as a sign of their weakness - their slavish mentality. Let us see some examples :-

In August 1983, it was known that Cecil Parkinson, had been a lover of his secretary Sara Keays. He eventually had to resign as Trade and Industries Secretary. But his wife Ann [and his daughters] stood by him.

 

In July 1992 it was revealed that David Mellor, the Secretary of State for National Heritage, had a love affair with model Antonia de Sancha. He eventually resigned as a minister, but his wife Judith stood by him.

 

During the October-November 1992 elections, Jennifer Flowers claimed that Bill Clinton ( now US President ) was her lover for 12 years. His wife Hillary stood by him and said on TV  “ I love, admire and cherish him. I am not going to see him ruined by this girl."

 

In October 1993, Transport Minister Steve Norris admitted having several lovers. But his wife did not desert him.

 

In December 1993 it was revealed that Environment Minister Tim Yeo 48, had a love affair with Julia Stent 34, a solicitor and a Tory local councillor in Hackney, East London. Their daughter Claudia-Marie was born in July 1993. But Mr Yeo’s wife Diane ( and his son Jonathan 23, and daughter Emily 21 ) stood by him, even when he later admitted to have fathered yet another child.

 

On 13th March 1994 Chief of Defence Staff Sir Peter Harding aged 60 resigned his £110,000 a year job after revelations of his love affair with Lady Bienvenida Buck, aged 31 to 37, wife of Sir Anthony Buck. But Sheila, wife of Sir Harding said, " I will stand by Sir Peter." [ Daily Mail 15 March 1994 ]

 

On 23 March 1994 Evening Standard reported, "  The Duke of Richmond and Gordon, 64, who last month admitted to a four-year affair with Croatian born travel agent Jessica Matasovic, 40, has told the Queen he is resigning as Lord Lieutenant of West Sussex Owner of 12,000 acre Goodwood Estate and " Glorious Goodwood " racecourse near Chichester, the duke, married with grown up children, became the Queen's representative in West Sussex in 1990. Confirming the affair has ended, the duke, a leading Anglican churchman, said he had paid his ex-lover £10,000 to help her through an illness."

But the duke's wife has not deserted him.

 

Alan Clark is a former defence procurement minister. He has standard career path - Eton, Oxford, the Bar, Member of Parliament.

On 1 June 1994 Andrew Pierce reported for the Times :- Clark's Coven flies in to deny blackmail

THE saga of Alan Clark and his “ Coven " degenerated into a public slanging match yesterday as the two sides in the sex scandal hurled accusations of blackmail, bribery and debauchery across the media.

Jane Clark claimed that Judge Harkness and his wife and stepdaughter – both of whom slept with Mr Clark - had demanded £100,000 for their silence; the Harkness family suggested that the former defence procurement minister had offered them the money to keep quiet. And in the midst of all the allegations and counter allegations, Mr Clark appeared at his castle gate to announce that while he deserved to be horsewhipped, he had changed his ways and was a reformed character.

Judge Harkness had arrived at Heathrow from South Africa with his wife, Valerie, and her daughter, Josephine, yesterday morning and promptly embarked on a series of television and newspaper interviews under the guidance of the publicist Max Clifford.

The women described in detail their amorous adventures with Mr Clark, who portrayed Mrs Harkness and her two daughters as “ the Coven " in his best-selling Diaries. Josephine accused the former minister of repeatedly exposing himself to her and her sister, Alison, when they were teenagers; Mr Harkness told of his humiliation at learning of his wife's affair..................

Josephine, now 34 and married to the wealthy South African architect Anthony van der Spuy, started the ball rolling with a hint that Mr Clark had offered to buy their silence. “ If we wanted to sell it we would have done so ten years ago when he was a top member of Tory Government, " she said  “ He had denied we were in the diaries, but he lied and went into print. I was recently married. I have a family name to protect. I am ashamed of my association with him."

But Mrs Clark swiftly launched a counter-attack, breaking off from feeding chickens at Saltwood Castle in Kent............ she added that she stood by her husband.....

 

On 31 May 1994 Sarah Grady reported for the Evening Standard  : Scathing Mrs Clark says : No divorce.

 

1.11 Others will look after their interests. What about us?

As Mr Godbole said time and time again, Germans and French, Jews and Arabs, Russians and Poles, Protestants and Catholics, and other mutually hostile communities of the world are quite capable of killing each other, as well as hugging each other. They look after their interests. Let us not worry about them. Let us worry about the future of the Hindus!

 

In February 1994 there was a peace settlement between Israelis and Palestinians. On 14th May, Israel handed over the control of the town of Jericho and the Gaza strip to Palestinians. In August, Jordan and Israel opened road link between the ports of Eliat and Aqaba (the road goes further to the historic city of Petra.) King Hussein of Jordan and Prime Minister Rabin of Israel met each other on this road on 8 August.  It is expected that there would soon be peace between Israelis and Syrians.

 

In September 1994 the Irish Republican Army (the Catholics) announced a cease-fire. Two weeks later the Loyalists (the Protestants) also declared their cease-fire. There are signs that there would soon be peace in Northern Ireland.

 

1.12 The Spying Game

 

On 22 February 1994 BBC1 reported at 2100 hours : Top CIA agent was discovered spying for Russia.

On 23 February Jeremy Campbell reported from Washington for the Evening Standard

Fears for British agents in US scandal

“ THE US spy scandal appeared to have caused the deaths of at least a doze American recruited agents abroad, it emerged today ........In a test of friendship, Mr Clinton wants the Russian leader to withdraw all his diplomats at the Russian embassy in Washington who worked with Aldritch Ames, the CIA official charged with selling secrets to the Russians for $1.5 million ( £1 million ). His wife Maria del Rosario has also been charged..........."

 A US intelligence source said, “The reason this case is being taken so seriously is that Ames may have been responsible for the arrests of our agents which were previously thought to be the work of Edward Lee Howard, the CIA official who escaped to Moscow in 1985. One of our agents executed that same year, the year Ames began spying for the Soviets, was Adolph Tolkachev, an important CIA recruit who worked for the Aviation Institute in Moscow. Not long after that, six or seven CIA recruits were apprehended in Moscow. We don't know their names. It was assumed that Howard was responsible but now we have a new trail to follow."

In London, there were fears that Ames may even have put at risk the lives of British agents, passing on details of UK intelligence operations to which America would have had access.

Sources in London were reluctant to discuss the issue but said assurances were expected and being sought from Washington about the extent of the treachery.

 

Mr Ames, 52, was one of the top officers in charge of recruiting Soviet officials for the CIA and had access to top-secret information about US agents and was well placed to do immense damage, a US official said. He was also in charge of monitoring Soviet efforts to recruit American spies.

 

On 24 February The Times carried an editorial entitled : Intelligence Test - Global espionage did not end with the Cold War.

Bill Clinton and Boris Yeltsin yesterday performed the rituals of allies publicly at odds but privately anxious to safeguard their partnership. Warren Christopher, the American Secretary of State, gave warning that relations would “depend on Russian actions in the days ahead" to mend the damage caused by the unmasking of Aldrich Ames, the CIA official alleged to have spied for Russia since 1985. President Yeltsin's spokesman, meanwhile, complained petulantly of “spymania" disrupting the progress of post-Cold War diplomacy.

 

On both sides, there was more embarrassment than true outrage. The fledging East-West alliance will survive this incident, albeit a little bruised. But the temptation to shrug off the Ames case should be resisted. If, as the FBI claims, Mr Ames was head of the counter-intelligence branch of the CIA's Soviet division between 1983 and 1985, his recruitment by the KGB was one of the most spectacular in the history of espionage. It would have given the Soviet Union unparalleled access to American intelligence on KGB agents; it would also have compromised the CIA's sources on the Soviet side. It may be, as was claimed yesterday, that Mr Ames's alleged treachery caused the death of American agents. Yet the primary function of a mole is to destabilise the intelligence community into which he burrows by spreading doubt and suspicion. The damage which Mr Ames caused is therefore impossible to quantify.

Whether the East learnt as much from Mr Ames as the West did from Oleg Gordievsky between 1975 and 1985 will probably never be known.............

........ Likewise, the flow of intelligence from the KGB's agents overseas has continued unabated. Just as Michael Smith, the British electronics engineer jailed for 25 years in November, continued to pass secrets to the Russians until July 1992, so Mr Ames is alleged to have spied for them until his arrest last Monday. The global influence of the KGB did not crumble with the Berlin Wall.

Nor is there any reason why it should have done so. One of the great delusions of the years since the Cold War ended has been the belief that espionage would become an obsolete craft. On the contrary : the uncertainties of the new geopolitics require a far more sophisticated approach to intelligence-gathering than was needed when superpower relations were governed by the fairly predictable rules of nuclear escalation. The Ames case reveals that the end of ideological confrontation has not weakened the appetite of States for the secrets of their enemies - or their allies. It poses as many questions about the future of espionage as it answers about its shadowy past.

 

On the same day Foreign staff of the Times reported :- Let us not return to Cold War, says Yeltsin. CIA mole blamed for up to 10 deaths.

“ UPTO ten agents spying for America were executed in Russia after being betrayed by Aldrich Ames, the former CIA official accused of being a Kremlin mole for nearly a decade, intelligence experts said yesterday." .............

 

“ The human toll of Mr Ames's alleged espionage emerged as America demanded that Moscow remove the two or three agents in its Washington embassy who worked with him. It also wants Russian help to assess the damage caused by the CIA's former head of Soviet counter-intelligence."

 

“ With billions of dollars in American aid at risk, both Washington and Moscow are anxious not to let the spy scandal damage their new-found friendship. President Clinton is under pressure to take a tough stance and even to freeze cash help for two months, but he said last night that he would await Russia's response before deciding whether to retaliate. He had known about the spy case for some time and had chosen to continue normal relations with Russia. It remained in America's interests to support the reform programme."

 

 “ Russia nevertheless accused the Americans of over-reacting, pointing out that Western countries show no signs of curtailing their intelligence activities in the East. ............ Warren Christopher, the American Secretary of State, had said earlier that the extent of damage to relationship between the two countries would depend on Moscow's actions, adding : “ The continuation of Russian espionage activities against the United States is unacceptable "

 

“ Detailed demands were issued to the Russian charge d'affaires in Washington when he was summoned to the State Department for a second time on Tuesday night. At the same time, Thomas Pickering, the American ambassador in Moscow, delivered another formal protest to the Russian foreign ministry."

 

“ In Moscow, however, officials sought to play down the damage caused by the arrest of Mr Ames. The Russians are annoyed that the Americans decided to make the case public at all..........Another said : " It's quite clear that the partnership that has been established doesn't mean refraining from gathering specific information. Our agents work in the United States and the Americans work in Russia, and that’s normal." Russia would be equally capable of exposing American diplomats and Russians working for the CIA. “ But we don't do this." About three dozen agents and eight Russian officers were exposed as spies in Moscow in 1992 and 1993.

 

“ Oleg Kalugin, a retired KGB general, said spying was a fact of life and should not be over-dramatised. The Russians caught several spies in Russia. Now the FBI have caught one. So, it’s quid pro quo.” The Americans argue, however, that their intelligence activities have been useful to the Russians; Robert Gates, CIA director under President Bush, said it had given warnings of the 1991 and 1993 coup attempts.

 

Elsewhere the Times reported, “ The Cold War has been ritually buried and former enemies are co-operating on fighting terrorism and international crime. Yet the Russian and Western spymasters remain enthusiastically in place."

 

“ Russia's foreign intelligence chief, Yevgeni Primakov, declined to comment other than to say he had never heard of Mr Ames or his wife, Maria, but his spokesman cheerfully told reporters : “ You can be sure that the Russians were not doing in Washington that the Americans were not doing in Moscow."

 

“ Oleg Gordievsky, who was recruited by MI6 in Copenhagen and progressed up the KGB ladder to be head of station-designate in London, was in a position to do as much damage to the KGB as Mr Ames is alleged to have done to the CIA. One of his first offerings when he defected was to reveal the names of Russian moles in Britain. Similarly, the most notorious traitors of the past, such as Kim Philby, were among moles in MI6 regarded by the KGB as the  “ Magnificent Seven " in their hall of fame."

 

Anne McElvoy reported from Moscow for the Times :-

Russian media put on old Soviet blinkers.

“ Russia's nascent free press has been flung back into the traditions of wooden Sovspeak, half-truths and slavish adherence to the “official version" by the spy scandal. Confronted with the news late on Tuesday evening, the editors of Russia's newspapers, television and radio news behaved as they were primed to do under Soviet rule and waited for Tass to lead the way. “ We would not have dreamt of interrupting the Winter Olympics coverage to bring this story" Ostankino state television said."

 

A prolonged silence, like in this case, indicates that the editors are panicking about what to say. On the night of the December elections, Ostankino blacked out its news coverage rather than admit the swing to the nationalists. Tass, which remains the semi-official voice of truth, finally clattered out a brief factual report, followed by a commentary. It reminded its subscribers that the “ leaders of the US and other Western countries have confirmed on many occasions that they did not intend to curtail intelligence activities with regard to Russia." This established the premise, developed by senior officials yesterday, which goes : “ Both sides continue to operate spies in each other’s countries. The West should not make too much fuss about having caught one. “

 

 

1.13 Caning of an American

In the last Newsletter we mentioned the caning of Michael Fay, an American convicted of vandalising cars in Singapore. On being freed Fay gave an interview on Israel radio because he received strong support from Israel human rights campaigners. His grandfathers were Jews who survived the Holocaust and his father Mr George Fay said that when his son’s background was made public “ it touched a chord in Israel.” [ who says religion does not matter ? ] Ref:- Daily Telegraph 2 June 1994.

 

1.14 Indian Madness

On 22 October 1992 New Civil Engineer reported, “ Calcutta’s second Hooghly Bridge was officially inaugurated by Indian prime minister Shri P M Narasimha Rao. The ceremony came more than 20 years after Indira Gandhi laid the foundation stone.  Delays were caused by political and technical disputes, including world-wide concern over box girders in early 1970s ( NCE 23 July ), and shortage of funds. But the erection of the deck and cables over the last 18 months, using a method devised by 3F Engineering Consultants, was rapid. The main cable stayed span of the bridge, named Vidyasagar Setu in last week’s ceremony, is 457m. Contractor was Braithwaite Burn & Jessop which is now seeking work outside India. Consultant was Schlaich Bergermann & Partners with Acer/ Freemen Fox & Partners, the original designer, as checking engineer. A third Hooghly bridge is already being considered.”

 

Why the delay?

Mr Godbole was involved with this project in 1970 when it was simply a line on a paper. The Marxist government of West Bengal wanted a Cable-stayed bridge to relieve the pressure on the first Hooghly bridge (popularly known as the Howrah Bridge ). But why a Cable-stayed one? Ah, we got to have an uptodate one.

 

The facts are these :-

Hooghly is a tidal river with a tide range of 20 feet. Howrah bridge was built during 1936 and February 1943 ( Seven years ). The contract was awarded to Cleveland Bridge Company of Darlington. Out of a total of 26,500 tons of steelwork Tata Iron and Steel Company of Jamshedpur supplied 23,500 tons. It was fabricated by Braithwaite, Burn & Jessop of Calcutta. Major items of plant and steelwork came from England. No shipment was lost even during world war II. Census of May 1946 revealed that the maximum number of vehicles using the bridge per hour was actually 20% higher than on London Bridge which is the busiest in the metropolis.

( Ref : The World’s great Bridges by H. Shirley-Smith, 1964 pp 142-147 )

 

A second bridge could have been easily built of the same design but in much shorter time. Most of the original designers, supervisors were alive. There have been advancements in technology, for example welding has superseded riveting . Very little, if any foreign exchange would have been required.

 

What have we achieved ?

Did India develop a new technique to build such bridges on her own ? NO. She still had to go with a begging bowl for the technology.

Did we save money ? NO.

Did we build without requiring any foreign exchange ? NO.

 

We wasted at least 13 years and incurred tremendous cost in delayed transport. True, the bridge was mentioned in the Guinness Book of Structures in 1976 as the 2nd longest steelplate & box girder span bridge ( under construction ). But the main span of the new bridge is exactly same as the old one i.e. 1500 feet.

 

Some may argue, “ surely, the Westerners too are just as thick-headed and wasteful." True, but they can afford it. India cannot. Let us take one example :-

Motorway M25 goes under British Railways between Chertsey and Virginia Waters. The Railway is carried on a Cable Stayed bridge. When the work was at tender stage in mid 1970s, Mr Godbole met the Bridge Engineer of British Rail, and asked why were they insisting on a cable stayed bridge when a simple plate girder bridge would do ? “ Ah,” said the BR Engineer,  “ The Department of Transport are paying for it. We told them that if they wanted to construct a Motorway under our Railway, they must construct a cable stayed bridge.”

 

1.15 Our Slavish Mentality

Kalnirnaya is a famous Marathi calendar used by many Marathas in Britain and America

On the back pages it contains some interesting information relating to food, religion, health, medicine, music, astrology, ecology etc. On the back of September 1994 we find a n article on how to face an interview by Nandu Sanglikar. He tells us how one Nitin Chakradev behaved at an interview and why he failed. Nitin found out why he was not selected. And the name of the prestigious company? Emerson & Canson of course!. It has to have an English name. It can’t be Joshi and Kulkarni, or Sharma and Varma, or Basu and Patel. We are still slaves of the English.

 

1.16 Might is Right

The TIMES reported on 1 July 1994, “ Colony cuts massacre references

Hong Kong’s Education Department has deleted from a school history textbook all references to the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre of pro-democracy activists in Peking, drawing howls of protests from teachers. The offending passage, barely 40 words, obliquely referred to the killings as an “ interference ” and the “ June 4 matter, ” said Chiu Chi-shing, vice-president of the Hong Kong Professional Teachers’ Union.

At the time of the massacre, in which hundreds, perhaps thousands of protesters were either killed or arrested, up to a million shocked Hong Kong people took to the colony’s streets to show their anger.

The deleting of the passage comes as the Hong Kong media are already being accused of self-censorship in being afraid to publish articles that might upset China.

 

1.17 Truth – who likes it? Who wants to know?

A friend of Mr Godbole had a heart-attack in 1988. He was rushed to hospital, treated and sent home when he felt comfortable. Exactly one year later, he received another heart-attack, a massive one this time. He was treated, and sent home when the hospital authorities felt it safe to do so. He was not at all happy. He was worried sick, but had no choice. He was admitted to the same hospital five times. And as now the hospitals are run as businesses, they say that they treated six patients! That is how the truth is twisted. But as long as the voters want to trust government figures and propaganda they will feel that the National Health is treating more patients than ever before.

 

2 Historical findings

Mr B.G.Keskar, a veteran freedom fighter and lawyer from Bhagyanagar ( Hyderabad ) has recently published a booklet in Marathi entitled Gandhila Nathuramne marale Nahi or Nathuram did not kill Mahtma Gandhi in 1948. The alleged murderer was a Congressman and he died in Pune in 1978. Our friend Dr Nene of Baroda had written an article in the 1992 Diwali issue of Marathi magazine Marmik , drawing the same conclusion

 

3 Behaviour of Christians and Muslims today

3.1 Position of women in European society

3.1.1 The beatings of wives

Tonight, a evening paper of London reported on 2 August 1994 :- JEKYLL AND HYDE

“ Amanda, a 35 year-old mother of five was strong willed enough to drag herself out of her agonising dilemma and start afresh with her children, aged between five and 16. She lives in South London. She met her former husband when she was just 19. At first everything seemed perfect but it didn’t take long for him to turn into a Jeckyll and Hyde type character. She recalls,” When he first beat me he was really apologetic and said he wouldn’t do it again, but he did many times. And every time I forgave him, I loved him and honestly believed him when he said that it would never happen again. My father was violent towards my mother, so when my husband started beating me it seemed normal in a way. He beat me horrendously, but I put up with it because I loved him. The beating took their toll, my self esteem was really low and any confidence I had, had been knocked out of me. I got used to the pain, that was just a physical thing I learned to handle.”

 

Amanda, who ended up with two black eyes and stitches in one of them after one of her husband’s savage attacks, continues, “ It was the kids that made me step back and take a long, hard look at my life. They knew what was going on between me and their dad and it was when we ended up in a home for battered wives I realised something had to be done. After 10 years of being beaten I decided it was about time I gave myself and my kids normal life. I got in touch with the DVU in Wandsworth and they gave me support I needed. Debbie, one of the unit’s officers really pulled me up by the shirt tails when she said, ‘ Mandy, it’s all up to you, what do you want out of life ?’ ........ I am one of the lucky ones who managed to get out.......”

 

Tonight also carried a report by Donna Dawber entitled Families at War.

She says, “ Domestic violence is something that happens to someone else. Most victims tend to put up and shut up until, on average, according to genuine statistics, at least the 35th violent attack, when it could possibly be too late. Women - and men - are too ashamed to admit they are violently abused at home by their partner and suffer in agonising silence. Mentally and physically scarred, victims generally believe they are worthless failures and find it difficult to discuss their problems with family or friends.”

 

“ So widespread is the incidence of one partner beating up the other that the number of domestic violence units ( DVU ‘s ), first established in 1987 in Tottenham, has mushroomed to 62 in London alone. The 126 full-time police officers provide support and advise victims on legal action they may want to take, as well as provide a sympathetic shoulder to cry on. Inspector Shirley Tulloch, who is in charge of the units throughout London, explains: “ In 1984 the then Commissioner decided to look at problems associated with violence in the home. Police were being called to more and more cases, which were becoming more vicious, and officers were getting assaulted. He wanted to sort out the existing problems and provide a decent service for victims. A positive arrest policy was encouraged to arrest at the scene of the crime if there was sufficient evidence and officers were also encouraged to give victims the support they needed. Some people were astounded when we set up the positive arrest policy - they couldn’t believe they were being arrested for beating their OWN wives in their OWN homes. ”

 

She stressed, “ Violence in the home is a very personal thing, which most people find difficult to admit. It’s one of those things that is never talked about. By the time victims pluck up courage to come to one of the units they’ve probably suffered a great deal of pain and anguish. They’re petrified and afraid they could lose everything they’ve got - family, home and regular income.”

 

Shirley Tulloch continued, “ The success of the units, a positive approach to victims and abuses and the partnership forged with other agencies has resulted in more victims coming forward. For example there was a 66 per cent increase in reported domestic violent assaults in 1991. We believe this is the tip of the iceberg. Research shows that a woman is assaulted 35 times on average before she reports it. And it is estimated that one in 4 women will suffer domestic violence at some time in their lives. A pilot project called Domestic Violence Matters was launched in February to cover the Islington and Kings Cross areas. It is based on work done in Onrtario, Canada, where trained family consultants work alongside police in the station on a shift pattern covering 18 hours a day. Police attend the scene of an incident and if there is sufficient evidence the abuser is arrested. Then the family consultant goes to the scene and deals with the needs of the victim. The project is being funded by the Home Office and Safer Cities. It will run for three years after which it will be fully evaluated. The Met also has a working party, which has looked at all aspects of the problem, including a new definition to include psychological and emotional abuse and refers to partners regardless of gender and sexual orientation. We acknowledge that there are also male victims and encourage them to come forward as well.”

 

3.1.2 Truth about divorces

On 15 October BBC2, in their series Timewatch ( 1410 hours ) dealt with the issue of divorce during 1945 to 1979. Very briefly it told us the following :-

1. Until 1945, divorce was available to British women in name only. It was impracticable to obtain it .

2. There were three grounds for divorce. Desertion, cruelty and adultery. The woman seeking divorce had to prove that her husband was guilty. How could she do this when she had no money ?

3. Women seeking divorce were further blackmailed as they would lose the custody of their children if they were divorced. A cruel and heart breaking situation for any woman. Men found guilty of adultry, however, had the right to see his children!

4. Women faced hostility from their own parents, even their mothers, who told them :- marriage was your decision, now you must bear the consequences.

5. Church authorities showed sympathy to the women seeking divorce, but pleaded that they were unable to help.

6. Women’s magazines were just as useless. The agony aunts would advise to make a go of the marriage.

7. If the marriage broke down, it was always regarded as the woman’s fault.

8. Labour Party was just as conservative as the Tories when it came to social issues. (Clement Attlee despised Edward the VIII and would not have served under him if he had married Mrs Simpson ). They came to power in 1945, but when a Labour woman M.P with the support of M.Ps from all sides put up a bill to modify the then current system of divorce, the government simply appointed a Royal Commission - a standard delaying tactic. The commission took 5 years to produce its report and did not recommend any action because of disagreements between its members.

9. When divorce was made relatively easy later on in the 1960s the position of women seeking divorce worsened. The properties were always in the name of the man. So, on divorce the woman would be thrown on the streets. [ Mr Godbole remembers a case in 1970. He used to live in the village of Hoddesdon in Hertfordshire. Through a Bengali couple living in the same village, he heard of the wife of a local supermarket manager. She complained that her husband beat her regularly and sought divorce. The social worker told her : - ‘what you say is true. But at least for the sake of the society your husband provides for you and your children. If you divorce him there is no guarantee that he would pay anomaly. In many cases husbands make the life hard simply by not paying the settlement money or forcing their wives to go to court every week. The life of divorced women is indeed bleak.’

That was the reality of life. The woman still divorced her husband, at a later day. ]

 

3.2 Carey backs Christian challenge to Islam

Damian Thompson, Religious correspondent reported for DailyTelegraph on 21 June 1994

“ Christianity’s right to challenge Islam was defended by the Archbishop of Canterbury yesterday in a sermon denouncing theological “bullies” who want to see Christians defer to other faiths. In a sermon affirming his evangelical roots, Dr Carey attacked liberal Christians who see other faiths as equally valid. “ One of the most disturbing trends in the Western Church has been a tendency for some to loosen their grip on the singularity of Jesus Christ.” He told a theological conference in Montreal

 

“ We have been bullied into this by a powerful theological voices which have suggested that Christianity must come to terms with its own ‘parochiality’. It has no right to challenge Islam or any other religion. “ It is merely a Western face of God. It must therefore surrender its commitment to being accepted in every part of the world and be content to be one face and one voice amongst many.” This view should be rejected, he said.

 

“ Of course we hear and respond to those who resist the militaristic methods of some evangelism. All mature Christians deplore forms of presentation which are insincere, manipulative or coercive, but to be concerned for these things does not mean we cease therefore to proclaim the uniqueness of Christ. To do so is a denial both of our history and our theology.” The area of relations with other faiths, especially Islam, has proved troublesome for Dr Carey. His attempts to encourage inter-faith dialogue while supporting the Decade of Evangelism have led to clashes with both evangelicals, who attacked him for attending a multi-faith Commonwealth service in Westminster Abbey and with Muslims, who have accused Lambeth Palace of targeting them.

 

Two years ago, the Decade organisers were forced to tone down an evangelistic campaign called Spearhead, renaming it Springboard after Muslim complaints.

 

The Rev Tony Higton, the General Synod member who led the campaign against the Commonwealth service, said last night that the archbishop’s comments were very welcome. “ I am particularly glad he has mentioned the challenge to other faiths. He needs to say the same thing loudly and clearly as well as in Canada.” he said.

Mr Ahmed Versi, editor of Muslim News and a leading commentator on Islamic affairs, said Christianity has the right to challenge Islam and vice versa. “ We are both religions who look for converts. [ but where would they come from ? only from Hindus ] “ What disturbs us is that Dr Carey and the Church of England do not support us  on issues like Muslim schools and new legislation to protect us from religiously -inspired violence. “ They talk about the two faiths living in harmony but their actions do not bear out their words.”

 

3.3 Cruelty to animals

Royal Society for prevention of cruelty to animals ( RSPCA ) continues to publish more and more horrifying cases. In a recent leaflet they say, “ Imagine being beaten every day of your life. Imagine being starved and left out in the cold by the person who is supposed to love you. Imagine being maliciously tortured and left to die in agonising pain. Sadly this is the reality of life for thousands of animals in Britain today - animals like Billy, the dog on the front of this leaflet. His heartless owner wrapped his starving pet in a plastic sack, and left him by a rubbish chute, almost hidden by rubbish bags waiting to incinerated. If he hadn’t been found, Billy would have starved to death. When we rescued him, Billy was so weak that he couldn’t even lift his head or crawl out of the open bag. We got him immediate veterinary attention, but the vet told us that Billy had been starved for so long that he probably wouldn’t live. Nevertheless we persevered, and very slowly Billy began to recover. Today he’s a happy dog, living in a good home.”

 

Tom’s story

 

What on earth inspires someone to take a kitten and punch its face and head with such violence that it is left staggering and fighting for breath? That’s what happened to ten-week-old Tom, bought from a pet shop and taken home only to suffer repeated, vicious beating. If he RSPCA hadn’t found him in time, Tom would almost certainly have died from his injuries.

We found Tom in a terrible state, hardly breathing and trembling with shock. But with love and care provided by the RSPCA, this small and battered creature made a quite amazing recovery. Today he’s a healthy contented cat, safe with a new family.

We took his cruel owner to court and he was banned from owning a pet ever again.

 

Nutcracker’s story

 

When Nutcracker was just a few weeks old he was fitted with a head collar. After that, his owners just ignored him. As time passed and Nutcracker grew bigger, the nose band became tighter and tighter. By the time he was three months old, it was embedded in his nose, causing an inch-deep rotting wound. Now Nutcracker could barely open his mouth to suckle from his mother. He was slowly starving to death, and in terrible pain. When we discovered him to free him from the head collar.

Nutcracker now lives with people who know how to care for him. His former owners were fined over £3,000

 

Every year we see more and more distressed, maltreated, frightened animals like Billy. In just one year, our Inspectors investigated over 88,600 complaints of cruelty. It’s a massive problem that is stretching RSPCA resources to breaking point. We rescued 3,223 animals from suffering and helped convict 1,456 people for inflicting pain and misery.

3.4 Muslim fanaticism

Evening Standard reported on 17 May 1994 “ About 5,000 Bangladeshis rampaged through capital Dhaka, smashing cars and stoning police in anger at water shortage. They claim India caused problem by ‘stealing ‘ water from Ganges.”

 

4. Why does History matter?

On 18 April 1994 commenting on events in former Yugoslavia, Valentine Low reported for the Evening Standard : Centuries-old enmity between Croats and Serbs erupted in this bloody tragedy.

THE BLOODY tragedy of Yugoslavia stretches back to a centuries-old enmity between the Catholic Croats and Orthodox Serbs. Since 1918 they were united along with the Slovenes under one country - Yugoslavia, the land of the south Slavs. But it was the Second World War that led to the bitterest memories. Hundreds of thousands of Serbs were massacred by the puppet fascist regime installed in Croatia, the Ustasha. After the war President Tito united the country under a communist-style federation of six “ people’s republics”. However, the differences between the ethnic groups, kept submerged under Tito’s rule, surfaced quickly after his death in 1990.

 

April-May 1990 : In the republic’s first elections after the collapse of the Communist regime, nationalist Franjo Tudjman’s party wins almost two-thirds of the seats in Croatia’s Parliament.

 

June 1991 : Slovenia, the most Westernised republic, declares independence. The Yugoslav army intervenes to try to stop it but fails. A month later Slovenia negotiates independence and withdrawal of troops.

Croatia - the second largest republic with 4.7 million people, 700,000 of them Serbs - declares independence at the same time as Croatia. Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic sends in the Yugoslav army, the JNA.

 

November 1991 : The eastern Croatian town of Vukovar falls after a four-month siege.

 

January 1992 : The Croatian war formally ends with a death toll of 10,000. Scores of villages have been wiped off the map. Bur despite the cease-fire and the 14,000 UN monitors, the fighting continues.

 

March : Former US Secretary of State Cyrus Vance brokers a peace agreement between Serbia and Croatia. Territory seized by the Serbs is to be demilitarised and become a protected zone.

 

April : Following a referendum in support of independence, war begins in Bosnia, where the population of 4.4 million people is a mix of 43.7 per cent Moslem, 31.4 per cent Serb and 17.3 per cent Croat. The Serbs claim 60 per cent of the land. [ But is that not the logic the Muslims use in India. Before partition 22% Muslims demanded parity with 75 % Hindus! ]

The day after war starts, Germany persuades the rest of the EC to recognise Bosnian independence. The Bosnian Moslem army is vastly outgunned by the Serbs, partly thanks to the UN arms embargo preventing supplies getting to them.

The Serbs drive out tens of thousands of Moslems from their homes - so called “ ethnic cleansing “ [ But, surely that is exactly what Muslims did in Pakistan and Bangladesh ! ] Later reports out of Bosnia show that Serbs have been keeping Moslems prisoners in virtual concentration camp conditions. [ Come on, Europeans do not do that sort of thing ]

 

May : The siege of Sarajevo begins, trapping 380,000 people. The UN imposes economic and political sanctions on Serbia, stopping all flights to Belgrade and banning trade.

 

June : 11,000 UN troops secure Sarajevo airport for relief flights. Meanwhile, Croatian troops are fighting for land claimed by Croatia in the west of the republic.

 

October-November : Serbs shell Dubrovnik in a bombardment that lasts for weeks, destroying much of the historic town - but they did not take it.

 

March 1993 : Gen Phillppe Morllion hoists a UN flag in the centre of the besieged Moslem town of Srebrenica and refuses to leave until the serbian siege is lifted. A so called “ safe area “ is created but months later turns out to be a hollow promise.

 

April : The Bosnian Serbs reject the Owen-Vance peace plan, which involved splitting Bosnia into ethnic cantons. In central Bosnia, Croats and Moslems are locked in a fight to the death for key towns.

 

Jan 1994 : President Slobodan Milosevic signs a treaty with Croatian leader Franjo Tudjman, secretly agreeing to carve up Bosnia between them.

 

Feb : 68 people are killed and 200 injured in bombing of the central market-place in Sarajevo. The UN threatens the Serbs with an ultimatum of air strikes if the Serbs do not withdraw heavy weapons from a 13-mile exclusion zone. The Serbs finally agree.

[Thus the conflict goes on and on. Why is it not ended ? Well, unlike Kuwait in 1990, Serbia does threaten vital western interests. Traditionally Croats are allies of Germany, Serbians are allies of the Russians, and Muslims ?- well the Muslim nations are helpless. ]

 

5 Why we cannot tell the truth

5.1 One of Mr Godbole's friend's son is studying Medicine in London. In 1991, in his first year, he failed in Anatomy. He could not believe it and wanted to appeal. He was told quite bluntly, " That would not be advisable. You may win the case. But you will ruin your future career as you will have a black mark against you. Better retake the examination - You will pass. The choice is yours."

 

5.2 On 23 July 1993 Richard Norton-Taylor reported for the Guardian

Man who exposed firm evicted

A former company director who saved the taxpayer more than £1 million by blowing the whistle on overpriced defence contracts was evicted from his home yesterday after years on the dole.

 

Jim Smith, aged 58, was sacked by Aish, a defence company based in Poole, Dorset, after questioning the firm's accounting system. The company subsequently paid £421,000 back to the Ministry of Defence. A further £600,000 was deducted during renegotiations on other contracts. His action was praised by the Commons Public Accounts Committee. In a report five years ago, it called for a " hot line " to encourage whistleblowers and informers to expose malpractices in the defence industry.

 

Mr Smith was refused compensation by the MoD. Concerned about creating a precedent, it said that it would probably have got the money back from Aish without his help. Mr Smith has been unable to secure a job ever since he exposed the loopholes in the department's pricing system in 1981. He was dismissed at a board meeting that year when he refused to agree to the company's procedures. He sued for unfair dismissal but lost his case at an industrial tribunal. He warned members of the Commons committee that the lack of mandatory post-contract investigations in the defence business could be costing the taxpayer up to £100 million a year. The MoD has since changed its procedures.

 

After an unsuccessful last-minute attempt to raise money, bailiffs evicted him and changed the locks at his home in Poole where he and his wife, Maureen, have lived for more than 20 years. Mr Smith had been struggling with unpaid debts and mortgage arrears amounting to £20,000. A spokesman for his mortgage company, the Chelsea Building Society, said that after twice agreeing to reschedule Mr Smith's repayments, it could wait no longer.

" Irrespective of how I feel about the building society, the real problem is I'am in this situation because I find myself without income and unable to work having taken an ethical stance." Mr Smith said yesterday. He said that despite the effect on his family, he would do the same again. " I feel a sense of sadness and distress." he said. Mr Smith has recently had a heart attack, and he and his wife suffer from angina. He is seeking legal advice about his chances of getting the eviction order rescinded. Meanwhile, he is applying for emergency local authority housing.

 

6 Acknowledgement

We are grateful to the following for their help :-

For posting copies of our newsletters in India  :-

Dr Gadre of Pune, Anjana Roy of Calcutta, Arvind Kulkarni of Preston Road,

London, Jawadekar of Pune.

For making copies of our newsletter and distributing the copies to friends ;-

Dina Nath Behl of London, Arvind Ghosh of USA

For distributing copies of Why Rewrite Indian History ? to friends

Mr Umapathy of London, (10 copies). Mr Ashok Athavale of Kanpur, India

( 50 copies )

For arranging a slide show on Taj Mahal

Mukund Raste, of Norwood, Surrey. -

 

7. Publicity and Appreciation

Please help by :-

* acknowledging  the receipt of this newsletter to the following address

                                  Mr V.S.Godbole

                                  14 Turnberry Walk

                                   Bedford

                                   MK 41, 8AZ

                                         U.K.

* sending money to Mr Godbole

* making five copies of this newsletter and sending them to your friends.

* arranging slide shows by Godbole at various social functions